Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Error Correction in Lattice Quantum Electrodynamics with Quantum Reference Frames
arXiv
Authors: Elias Rothlin, Carla Ferradini, Lin-Qing Chen
Year
2026
Paper ID
45498
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
200
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Is gauge symmetry merely a redundancy in our description, or does it carry a deeper information-theoretic significance? Quantum error-correcting codes (QECCs) show that redundancy can serve as a resource for protecting information against noise. In this work, we ask whether gauge theories can be understood in similar terms, and make this idea concrete in lattice quantum electrodynamics (QED), building on and extending earlier works that established a bridge between gauge systems, stabilizer codes, and quantum reference frames (QRFs). For Abelian gauge groups, we show that explicit recovery operations can be constructed using group-theoretical methods for error sets determined by both ideal and non-ideal QRFs. Applied to lattice QED, this yields two QECC structures: one in the pure-gauge sector and one including fermions. We construct a gauge-field QRF based on spanning trees of the lattice and a fermionic field QRF from the matter field, thereby making explicit how physical information is encoded. While the syndromes of gauge-violating errors associated with constraint measurements are generically degenerate, QRFs resolve this degeneracy and single out families of correctable errors. This establishes lattice QED as a QECC beyond the stabilizer setting and shows concretely how gauge symmetry provides an encoding structure that supports error correction.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Is gauge symmetry merely a redundancy in our description, or does it carry a deeper information-theoretic significance?
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.