Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Higher rates for semi-device-independent randomness expansion by recycling input randomness
arXiv
Authors: Rutvij Bhavsar, Hamid Tebyanian, Roger Colbeck
Year
2026
Paper ID
45488
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
122
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Although quantum random number generators rely on the inherent indeterminism of quantum mechanics, ensuring that the numbers produced are secure remains a significant challenge. We introduce two semi-device-independent randomness expansion protocols in a prepare-and-measure setting, where the source and measurement devices are treated as uncharacterised and we assume trust only in testing device, which could be implemented using a photodiode. One protocol achieves expansion by recycling the input randomness, while the other uses a biased input distribution to achieve expansion in settings where recycling is not possible. The protocols are proven secure against quantum side information. Our results show that high randomness rates are achievable under experimentally realistic conditions, with expansion obtained in as few as 105 to 106 rounds with the recycling protocol.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Although quantum random number generators rely on the inherent indeterminism of quantum mechanics, ensuring that the numbers produced are secure remains a significant challenge.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.