Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Quantifying magic via quantum (α,β) Jensen-Shannon divergence
arXiv
Authors: Linmao Wang, Zhaoqi Wu
Year
2026
Paper ID
45478
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
119
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Magic states play an important role in fault-tolerant quantum computation, and so the quantification of magic for quantum states is of great significance. In this work, we propose two new magic quantifiers by introducing two versions of quantum (α,β) Jensen-Shannon divergence based on the quantum (α,β) entropy and the quantum (α,β)-relative entropy, respectively. We derive many desirable properties for our magic quantifiers, and find that they are efficiently computable in low-dimensional Hilbert spaces. We also show that the initial nonstabilizerness in the input state can boost the magic generating power for our magic quantifiers with appropriate parameter ranges for a certain class of quantum gates. Our magic quantifiers may provide new tools for addressing some specific problems in magic resource theory.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Magic states play an important role in fault-tolerant quantum computation, and so the quantification of magic for quantum states is of great significance.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.