Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Quantum Simulation of Collective Neutrino Oscillations using Dicke States

arXiv
Authors: Katarina Bleau, Nikolina Ilic, Joachim Kopp, Ushak Rahaman, Xin Yue Yu

Year

2026

Paper ID

45428

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

94

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In dense neutrino gases, which exist for instance in supernovae, the flavour states of different neutrinos may become entangled with one another. The theoretical description of such systems may therefore call for simulations on a quantum computer. Existing quantum simulations of simple toy systems are not optimal in the sense that they do not fully exploit the symmetries of the system. Here, we propose a new class of qubit-efficient algorithms based on Dicke states and the su(2) spin algebra. We demonstrate the excellent performance of these algorithms both on classical and on quantum hardware.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In dense neutrino gases, which exist for instance in supernovae, the flavour states of different neutrinos may become entangled with one another.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #45428 #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69590 Quantum Simulation of Spin-Depe... #69578 Fourier analysis of quantum neu... #69576 Efficient Simulation of Szegedy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.