Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

Divide et impera: hybrid multinomial classifiers from quantum binary models

arXiv
Authors: Simone Roncallo, Angela Rosy Morgillo, Seth Lloyd, Chiara Macchiavello, Lorenzo Maccone

Year

2026

Paper ID

45396

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

86

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We investigate how to combine a collection of quantum binary models into a multinomial classifier. We employ a hybrid approach, adopting strategies like one-vs-one, one-vs-rest and a binary decision tree. We benchmark each method, by emphasizing their computational overhead and their impact on the quantum advantage. By comparison against a classical binary model (generalized using the same approach), we show that the decision tree represents a cost-effective solution, achieving similar accuracies to other methods with an overhead at most logarithmic in the total number of classes.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We investigate how to combine a collection of quantum binary models into a multinomial classifier.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #45396 #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69025 Machine-Learning Optimization a... #69003 QBugLM: An Agentic Benchmarking... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.