Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Dismagicker: Unitary Gate for Non-Stabilizerness Reduction
arXiv
Authors: Jiale Huang, Rongyi Lv, Xiangjian Qian, Mingpu Qin
Year
2026
Paper ID
45198
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce the notion of dismagicker: non-Clifford unitary gate designed to reduce the non-stabilizerness (also called magic) of quantum many-body states. Although both entanglement and non-stabilizerness are fundamental quantum resources, they require distinct control strategies. While disentanglers (unitary operations that lower entanglement) are well-established in tensor network methods, analogous concept for non-stabilizerness suppression has been largely missing. In this work, we define dismagicker as non-Clifford unitary operation that actively suppresses non-stabilizerness, steering states toward classically simulatable stabilizer states. We develop optimization method for constructing dismagickers within the Matrix Product States framework. Our numerical results show that the non-stabilizerness reduction procedure, when combined with entanglement reduction steps with Clifford circuits, significantly improves the accuracy for both classical simulation of many-body systems and quantum state preparation on quantum devices. Dismagicker enriches our toolkit for the manipulation of many-body states by unifying non-stabilizerness and entanglement reduction.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce the notion of dismagicker: non-Clifford unitary gate designed to reduce the non-stabilizerness (also called magic) of quantum many-body states.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.