Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

On the hydrodynamic interpretation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics

Crossref
Authors: James Day

Year

2026

Paper ID

45170

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

100

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The Madelung equations express the Schrödinger equation as a continuity equation and modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation. These equations are equivalent to the Euler equations for a compressible, potential flow, when classical pressure per unit density is replaced by the quantum potential per unit mass. We extend this hydrodynamic interpretation by quantising a single, spinless, non-relativistic particle constrained to a surface wave with small slope. The wave is distinct from the wave function and, in order to reproduce the Schrödinger equation, it must satisfy the kinematic boundary condition for a free surface advected by twice the Madelung velocity field.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The Madelung equations express the Schrödinger equation as a continuity equation and modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #45170 #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse... #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69030 Non-Hermitian Crystalline Braid... #69029 Higher-order Symmetric Quantum ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.