Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Gravimetry through non-linear optomechanics

arXiv
Authors: Sofia Qvarfort, Alessio Serafini, Peter F. Barker, Sougato Bose

Year

2017

Paper ID

44943

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

157

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We propose a new method for measurements of gravitational acceleration using a quantum optomechanical system. As a proof-of-concept, we investigate the fundamental sensitivity for a cavity optomechanical system for gravitational accelerometry with a light-matter interaction of the canonical `trilinear' radiation pressure form. The phase of the optical output of the cavity encodes the gravitational acceleration g and is the only component which needs to be measured to perform the gravimetry. We analytically show that homodyne detection is the optimal readout in our scheme, based on the cyclical decoupling of light and matter, and predict a fundamental sensitivity of Δg = 10-15 ms-2 for currently achievable optomechanical systems which could, in principle, surpass the best atomic interferometers even for low optical intensities. Our scheme is strikingly robust to the initial thermal state of the mechanical oscillator as the accumulated gravitational phase only depends on relative position separation between components of the entangled optomechanical state arising during the evolution.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44943 #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc... #67353 Operational Framework for a Qua... #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67347 Evidence of the quantum-optical...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.