Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Gravimetry through non-linear optomechanics
arXiv
Authors: Sofia Qvarfort, Alessio Serafini, Peter F. Barker, Sougato Bose
Year
2017
Paper ID
44943
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
157
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a new method for measurements of gravitational acceleration using a quantum optomechanical system. As a proof-of-concept, we investigate the fundamental sensitivity for a cavity optomechanical system for gravitational accelerometry with a light-matter interaction of the canonical `trilinear' radiation pressure form. The phase of the optical output of the cavity encodes the gravitational acceleration g and is the only component which needs to be measured to perform the gravimetry. We analytically show that homodyne detection is the optimal readout in our scheme, based on the cyclical decoupling of light and matter, and predict a fundamental sensitivity of Δg = 10-15 ms-2 for currently achievable optomechanical systems which could, in principle, surpass the best atomic interferometers even for low optical intensities. Our scheme is strikingly robust to the initial thermal state of the mechanical oscillator as the accumulated gravitational phase only depends on relative position separation between components of the entangled optomechanical state arising during the evolution.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.