Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Chemistry
Experimental protection of the coherence of a molecular qubit exceeding a millisecond
arXiv
Authors: Yingqiu Dai, Zhifu Shi, Yue Fu, Xi Qin, Shiwei Mu, Yang Wu, Ji-Hu Su, Lei Qin, Yuan-Qi Zhai, Yi-Fei Deng, Xing Rong, Jiangfeng Du
Year
2017
Paper ID
44934
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
196
Citations
N/A
Abstract
There are several important solid-state systems, such as defects in solids, superconducting circuits and molecular qubits, for attractive candidates of quantum computations. Molecular qubits, which benefit from the power of chemistry for the tailored and inexpensive synthesis of new systems, face the challenge from decoherence effect. The decoherence effect is due to the molecular qubits' inevitable interactions to their environment. Strategies to overcome decoherence effect have been developed, such as designing a nuclear spin free environment and working at atomic clock transitions. These chemical approaches, however, have some fundamental limitations. For example, chemical approach restricts the ligand selection and design to ligands with zero nuclear magnetic dipole moment, such as carbon, oxygen, and sulfur. Herein, a physical approach, named Dynamical decoupling (DD), is utilized to combat decoherence, while the limitations of the chemical approaches can be avoided. The phase memory time T2 for a transition metal complex has been prolonged to exceed one millisecond (1.4ms) by employing DD. The single qubit figure of merit QM reaches 1.4times 105, which is 40 times better than that previously reported value for such system. Our results show that molecular qubits, with milliseconds T2, are promising candidates for quantum information processing.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.