Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Superconducting Qubits

Optimal configurations for normal-metal traps in transmon qubits

arXiv
Authors: A. Hosseinkhani, R. -P. Riwar, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. I. Glazman, G. Catelani

Year

2017

Paper ID

44928

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

134

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Controlling quasiparticle dynamics can improve the performance of superconducting devices. For example, it has been demonstrated effective in increasing lifetime and stability of superconducting qubits. Here we study how to optimize the placement of normal-metal traps in transmon-type qubits. When the trap size increases beyond a certain characteristic length, the details of the geometry and trap position, and even the number of traps, become important. We discuss for some experimentally relevant examples how to shorten the decay time of the excess quasiparticle density. Moreover, we show that a trap in the vicinity of a Josephson junction can reduce the steady-state quasiparticle density near that junction, thus suppressing the quasiparticle-induced relaxation rate of the qubit. Such a trap also reduces the impact of fluctuations in the generation rate of quasiparticles, rendering the qubit more stable.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44928 #67342 Parametrically controlled chira... #67316 Synthetic high angular momentum... #67308 Multi-frequency control and mea... #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.