Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Superconducting Qubits

Demonstration of the Essentiality of Entanglement in a Deutsch-like Quantum Algorithm

arXiv
Authors: He-Liang Huang, Ashutosh K. Goswami, Wan-Su Bao, Prasanta K. Panigrahi

Year

2017

Paper ID

44918

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

108

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum algorithms could efficiently solve certain classically intractable problems by exploiting quantum parallelism. To date, whether the quantum entanglement is useful or not for quantum computing is still a question of debate. Here, we present a new quantum algorithm to show that entanglement could help to gain advantage over classical algorithm and even the quantum algorithm without entanglement. Furthermore, we implement experiments to demonstrate our proposed algorithm using superconducting qubits. Our results show the viability of the algorithm and suggest that entanglement is essential in getting quantum speedup for certain problems in quantum computing, which provide a reliable and clear guidance for developing useful quantum algorithms in future.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Quantum algorithms could efficiently solve certain classically intractable problems by exploiting quantum parallelism.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44918 #72999 Superconducting singlet-triplet... #72998 Majorana parity qubit in couple...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.