Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Hyperfine-assisted fast electric control of dopant nuclear spins in semiconductors

arXiv
Authors: Péter Boross, Gábor Széchenyi, András Pályi

Year

2017

Paper ID

44849

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

145

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Nuclear spins of dopant atoms in semiconductors are promising candidates as quantum bits, due to the long lifetime of their quantum states. Conventionally, coherent control of nuclear spins is done using ac magnetic fields. Using the example of a phosphorus atom in silicon, we theoretically demonstrate that hyperfine interaction can enhance the speed of magnetic control: the electron on the donor amplifies the ac magnetic field felt by the nuclear spin. Based on that result, we show that hyperfine interaction also provides a means to control the nuclear spin efficiently using an ac electric field, in the presence of intrinsic or artificial spin-orbit interaction. This electric control scheme is especially efficient and noise-resilient in a hybrid dot-donor system holding two electrons in the presence of an inhomogeneous magnetic field. The mechanisms proposed here could be used as building blocks in nuclear-spin-based electronic quantum information architectures.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44849 #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc... #67353 Operational Framework for a Qua... #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67347 Evidence of the quantum-optical...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.