!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Dining Philosophers, Leader Election and Ring Size problems, in the quantum setting
arXiv
Authors: Dorit Aharonov, Maor Ganz, Loick Magnin
Year
2017
Paper ID
44816
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
145
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We provide the first quantum (exact) protocol for the Dining Philosophers problem (DP), a central problem in distributed algorithms. It is well known that the problem cannot be solved exactly in the classical setting. We then use our DP protocol to provide a new quantum protocol for the tightly related problem of exact leader election (LE) on a ring, improving significantly in both time and memory complexity over the known LE protocol by Tani et. al. To do this, we show that in some sense the exact DP and exact LE problems are equivalent; interestingly, in the classical non-exact setting they are not. Hopefully, the results will lead to exact quantum protocols for other important distributed algorithmic questions; in particular, we discuss interesting connections to the ring size problem, as well as to a physically motivated question of breaking symmetry in 1D translationally invariant systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We provide the first quantum (exact) protocol for the Dining Philosophers problem (DP), a central problem in distributed algorithms.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.