Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Intrinsic and environmental effects on the interference properties of a high-performance quantum dot single photon source
arXiv
Authors: Stefan Gerhardt, Jake Iles-Smith, Dara P. S. McCutcheon, Yu-Ming He, Sebastian Unsleber, Simon Betzold, Niels Gregersen, Jesper Mørk, Sven Höfling, Christian Schneider
Year
2017
Paper ID
44709
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
132
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We report a joint experimental and theoretical study of the interference properties of a single photon source based on a In(Ga)As quantum dot embedded in a quasi-planar GaAs-microcavity. Using resonant laser excitation with a pulse separation of 2 ns, we find near-perfect interference of the emitted photons, and a corresponding indistinguishability of mathcal{I} = \(99.6 + 0.4- 1.4\)\%. For larger pulse separations, quasi-resonant excitation conditions, increasing pump power or with increasing temperature, the interference contrast is progressively and notably reduced. We present a systematic study of the relevant dephasing mechanisms, and explain our results in the framework of a microscopic model of our system. For strictly resonant excitation, we show that photon indistinguishability is independent of pump power, but strongly influenced by virtual phonon assisted processes which are not evident in excitonic Rabi oscillations.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.