Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Quantum gate identification: error analysis, numerical results and optical experiment

arXiv
Authors: Yuanlong Wang, Qi Yin, Daoyi Dong, Bo Qi, Ian R. Petersen, Zhibo Hou, Hidehiro Yonezawa, Guo-Yong Xiang

Year

2017

Paper ID

44532

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

141

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The identification of an unknown quantum gate is a significant issue in quantum technology. In this paper, we propose a quantum gate identification method within the framework of quantum process tomography. In this method, a series of pure states are inputted to the gate and then a fast state tomography on the output states is performed and the data are used to reconstruct the quantum gate. Our algorithm has computational complexity O\(d3\) with the system dimension d. The algorithm is compared with maximum likelihood estimation method for the running time, which shows the efficiency advantage of our method. An error upper bound is established for the identification algorithm and the robustness of the algorithm against the purity of input states is also tested. We perform quantum optical experiment on single-qubit Hadamard gate to verify the effectiveness of the identification algorithm.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44532 #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc... #67353 Operational Framework for a Qua... #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67347 Evidence of the quantum-optical...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.