Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Controllable electron spin dephasing due to phonon state distinguishability in a coupled quantum dot system

arXiv
Authors: Michał Gawełczyk, Mateusz Krzykowski, Krzysztof Gawarecki, Paweł Machnikowski

Year

2017

Paper ID

44524

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

148

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We predict a spin pure dephasing channel in electron relaxation between states with unequal Zeeman splittings, exemplified by a spin-preserving electron tunneling between quantum dots in a magnetic field. The dephasing is caused by a mismatch in electron g-factors in the dots leading to distinguishability of phonons emitted during tunneling with opposite spins. Combining multiband boldsymbol{k}{cdot}boldsymbol{p} modeling and dynamical simulations via a Master equation we show that this fundamental effect of spin measurement effected by the phonon bath may be widely controlled by the size and composition of the dots or on demand, via tuning of external fields. By comparing the numerically simulated degree of dephasing with the predictions of general theory based on distinguishability of environment states, we show that the proposed mechanism is the dominant phonon-related spin dephasing channel and may limit spin coherence time in tunnel-coupled structures at cryogenic temperatures.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44524 #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67337 Parameterization and optimizabi... #67335 Detecting Errors in a Quantum N... #67330 Multi-qubit quantum state prepa...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.