Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

Quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality

arXiv
Authors: Flavien Hirsch, Marco Túlio Quintino, Nicolas Brunner

Year

2017

Paper ID

44463

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

104

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities. Specifically, we present explicitly a given a set of non jointly measurable POVMs mathcal{M}A with the following property. Considering a bipartite Bell test where Alice uses mathcal{M}A, then for any possible shared entangled state ρ and any set of (possibly infinitely many) POVMs mathcal{N}B performed by Bob, the resulting statistics admits a local model, and can thus never violate any Bell inequality. This shows that quantum measurement incompatibility does not imply Bell nonlocality in general.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We discuss the connection between the incompatibility of quantum measurements, as captured by the notion of joint measurability, and the violation of Bell inequalities.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44463 #73033 Non-Markovian Poissonian Sponta... #72993 GHz-rate all-fiber active polar... #72988 Lean-QIT: Towards a Formal Infr... #72977 Revealing Entanglement-Growth M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.