Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Gravity Relativistic Quantum Information Quantum Readout Measurement Hardware

A path integral formulation for particle detectors: the Unruh-DeWitt model as a line defect

arXiv
Authors: I. M. Burbano, T. Rick Perche, Bruno de S. L. Torres

Year

2020

Paper ID

444

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

122

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Particle detectors are an ubiquitous tool for probing quantum fields in the context of relativistic quantum information (RQI). We formulate the Unruh-DeWitt (UDW) particle detector model in terms of the path integral formalism. The formulation is able to recover the results of the model in general globally hyperbolic spacetimes and for arbitrary detector trajectories. Integrating out the detector's degrees of freedom yields a line defect that allows one to express the transition probability in terms of Feynman diagrams. Inspired by the light-matter interaction, we propose a gauge invariant detector model whose associated line defect is related to the derivative of a Wilson line. This is another instance where nonlocal operators in gauge theories can be interpreted as physical probes for quantum fields.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Gravity & Relativistic Quantum Information research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Particle detectors are an ubiquitous tool for probing quantum fields in the context of relativistic quantum information (RQI).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #444

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.