Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Superconducting Qubits

Measurements of a Quantum Dot with an Impedance-Matching On-Chip LC Resonator at GHz Frequencies

arXiv
Authors: M. -C. Harabula, T. Hasler, G. Fülöp, M. Jung, V. Ranjan, C. Schönenberger

Year

2017

Paper ID

44358

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

150

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report the realization of a bonded-bridge on-chip superconducting coil and its use in impedance-matching a highly ohmic quantum dot (QD) to a rm{3 GHz} measurement setup. The coil, modeled as a lumped-element LC resonator, is more compact and has a wider bandwidth than resonators based on coplanar transmission lines (e.g. λ/4 impedance transformers and stub tuners) at potentially better signal-to-noise ratios. In particular for measurements of radiation emitted by the device, such as shot noise, the 50times larger bandwidth reduces the time to acquire the spectral density. The resonance frequency, close to 3.25 GHz, is three times higher than that of the one previously reported wire-bonded coil. As a proof of principle, we fabricated an LC circuit that achieves impedance-matching to a rm{sim 15 kΩ} load and validate it with a load defined by a carbon nanotube QD of which we measure the shot noise in the Coulomb blockade regime.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44358 #67342 Parametrically controlled chira... #67316 Synthetic high angular momentum... #67308 Multi-frequency control and mea... #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.