Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Relaxation of an ensemble of two-level emitters in a squeezed bath
arXiv
Authors: Alexander Holm Kiilerich, Klaus Mølmer
Year
2017
Paper ID
44240
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
159
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We derive and evaluate equations of motion for the mean values and variances of the components of spins collectively coupled to a broadband squeezed radiation reservoir. Our formalism bridges between a single two-level emitter, represented by spin components that relax at different rates, depending on the degree of squeezing, to an ensemble of emitters represented by a large collective spin, whose components relax independently of the squeezing. For a single spin, the steady state fluctuations in the transverse components are independent of the squeezing, while the steady state of a large spin ensemble reflects the statistics of the squeezed reservoir. This follows from an analysis of the Langevin noise contributions to the equations of motion and their consequences for the first and second moments of the spin operators. We argue that the difference between a single and many spins is related to whether vacuum fluctuations or radiation reaction dominate the coupling of the spin system to the radiation environment.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We derive and evaluate equations of motion for the mean values and variances of the components of spins collectively coupled to a broadband squeezed radiation reservoir.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.