Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Benchmarking quantum annealers using symmetries in embedded subgraphs
arXiv
Authors: Dilina Perera, Bhavika Bhalgamiya, M. A. Novotny
Year
2017
Paper ID
44214
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
108
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate an efficient, generic method for evaluating the performance of quantum annealing devices that does not require the prior knowledge of the true ground state of the benchmark problem. This approach exploits symmetry properties inherent to the ground states of a composite Hamiltonian comprising the benchmark problem Hamiltonian and its symmetric counterpart. Using this method, we compare the performance of two generations of D-Wave machines. Although we do not observe a noticeable difference in the probability of finding solutions with the required symmetry, our results suggest that the current generation of D-Wave machines notably outperforms its predecessor in finding states closer to those with the required symmetry.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate an efficient, generic method for evaluating the performance of quantum annealing devices that does not require the prior knowledge of the true ground state of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.