Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Schrodinger Equation weakly attractive 1/r^2 Potential Eigenfunctions
arXiv
Authors: Philip E. Bloomfield
Year
2017
Paper ID
44194
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
168
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Bound state solutions of the Schrodinger Equation for the -a/r2 potential have been presented recently for both the weak and strong coupling cases. However, Shortley in 1931 and Landau and Lifshitz in 1958 claimed that no bound state solutions exist for the weak coupling case when 0 < 2ma/hbar2 <= (l + 1/2)2. We demonstrate that one bound state solution can exist for each angular momentum state l, and that a complete orthogonal set of continuum eigenfunctions orthogonal to the bound state eigenfunction can be constructed when l(l+ 1) < 2ma/hbar2 <= (l + 1/2)2. We show that Shortley's argument is spurious due to his neglecting a boundary term arising from the momentum operator and that the Landau and Lifshitz claim is based on a restrictive fitting of the exterior solution to an interior spherical well. Instead, to each weak coupling, a, we find a unique interior well strength Vin = -a'/ro2 which yields a finite bound state. In particular for the l = 0 case the well strength is given by: 2ma'/hbar2 = 1.3734 + 2.2265*\(1/4 - 2ma'/hbar2\)1/2.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Bound state solutions of the Schrodinger Equation for the -a/r^2 potential have been presented recently for both the weak and strong coupling cases.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.