Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Laser-written polarizing directional coupler with reduced interaction length

arXiv
Authors: I. V. Dyakonov, M. Yu. Saygin, I. V. Kondratyev, A. A. Kalinkin, S. S. Straupe, S. P. Kulik

Year

2017

Paper ID

44027

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

141

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Integrated optical devices are becoming a common tool in modern optical science and engineering. This devices should be designed to allow for precise control and manipulation of light. The femtosecond laser written (FSLW) photonic chips have proven to cope with the most current demands of integrated photonics. However, up to date the polarization degree of freedom has rarely been exploited in experiments performed on the FSLW integrated platform. The main obstacle is an intrinsically low anisotropy of laser written waveguides, preventing the design of polarizing integrated devices with small footprint. In this Letter we demonstrate the approach based on stress-induced anisotropy allowing us to decrease the size of polarizing directional couplers fabricated with the FSLW technology by almost an order of magnitude. We provide an accurate account for the effects emerging in waveguides written in a close proximity to each over.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44027 #67360 Quadrupolar resonance spectrosc... #67353 Operational Framework for a Qua... #67351 Quantum-assisted Rendezvous on ... #67347 Evidence of the quantum-optical...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.