Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Finite-Size Corrections to the Excitation Energy Transfer in a Massless Scalar Interaction Model

arXiv
Authors: Nobuki Maeda, Tetsuo Yabuki, Yutaka Tobita, Kenzo Ishikawa

Year

2016

Paper ID

43859

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

85

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study the excitation energy transfer (EET) for a simple model in which a massless scalar particle is exchanged between two molecules. We show that a finite-size effect appears in EET by the interaction energy due to overlapping of the quantum waves in a short time interval. The effect generates finite-size corrections to Fermi's golden rule and modifies EET probability from the standard formula in the Forster mechanism. The correction terms come from transition modes outside the resonance energy region and enhance EET probability substantially.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study the excitation energy transfer (EET) for a simple model in which a massless scalar particle is exchanged between two molecules.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #43859 #68465 Bounding Eigenstate Overlap fro... #68440 Classical State Preparation for... #68437 Transition-state lattice modes ... #68423 Selective Fermi-Level Pinning: ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.