You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits Photonic Quantum Computing

Observation of the 1S0 to 3D1 clock transition in 175Lu^+

arXiv
Authors: Kyle J. Arnold, R. Kaewuam, A. Roy, E. Paez, S. Wang, M. D. Barrett

Year

2016

Paper ID

43830

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

77

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We report the first laser spectroscopy of the 1S0 to 3D1 clock transition in 175Lu^+. Clock operation is demonstrated on three pairs of Zeeman transitions, one pair from each hyperfine manifold of the 3D1 term. We measure the hyperfine intervals of the 3D1 to 10 ppb uncertainty and infer the optical frequency averaged over the three hyperfine transitions to be 353.639 915 952 2 (6) THz. The lifetime of the 3D1 state is inferred to be 174+23-32 hours from the M1 coupling strength.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report the first laser spectroscopy of the ^1S0 to ^3D1 clock transition in ^175Lu^+.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #43830 #69031 Amplitude-dependent quantum hyd... #69022 Contacting Josephson Junctions ... #69011 Improved Cryogenic Photodiode O... #68999 Suppression of Quasiparticle Po...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.