Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Local Decoders for the 2D and 4D Toric Code
arXiv
Authors: Nikolas P. Breuckmann, Kasper Duivenvoorden, Dominik Michels, Barbara M. Terhal
Year
2016
Paper ID
43827
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
137
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We analyze the performance of decoders for the 2D and 4D toric code which are local by construction. The 2D decoder is a cellular automaton decoder formulated by Harrington which explicitly has a finite speed of communication and computation. For a model of independent X and Z errors and faulty syndrome measurements with identical probability we report a threshold of 0.133\% for this Harrington decoder. We implement a decoder for the 4D toric code which is based on a decoder by Hastings arXiv:1312.2546 . Incorporating a method for handling faulty syndromes we estimate a threshold of 1.59\% for the same noise model as in the 2D case. We compare the performance of this decoder with a decoder based on a 4D version of Toom's cellular automaton rule as well as the decoding method suggested by Dennis et al. arXiv:quant-ph/0110143 .
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We analyze the performance of decoders for the 2D and 4D toric code which are local by construction.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.