Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Dynamic phase transitions of a driven Ising chain in a dissipative cavity
arXiv
Authors: Xi-Wang Luo, Yu-Na Zhang, Xingxiang Zhou, Guang-Can Guo, Zheng-Wei Zhou
Year
2016
Paper ID
43679
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
104
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the nonequilibrium quantum phase transition of an Ising chain in a dissipative cavity driven by an external transverse light field. When driving and dissipation are in balance, the system can reach a nonequilibrium steady state which undergoes a super-radiant phase transition as the driving strength increases. Interestingly, the super-radiant field changes the effective bias of the Ising chain in return and drives its own transition between the ferromagnetic and paramagnetic phase. We study the rich physics in this system with sophisticated behavior, and investigate important issues in its dynamics such as the stability of the system and criticality of the phase transition.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the nonequilibrium quantum phase transition of an Ising chain in a dissipative cavity driven by an external transverse light field.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.