Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Mutually unbiased maximally entangled bases in mathbb{C}dotimesmathbb{C}d

arXiv
Authors: Junying Liu, Minghui Yang, Keqin Feng

Year

2016

Paper ID

43669

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

120

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study mutually unbiased maximally entangled bases (MUMEB's) in bipartite system mathbb{C}dotimesmathbb{C}d \(d geq 3\). We generalize the method to construct MUMEB's given in [16], by using any commutative ring R with d elements and generic character of (R,+) instead of mathbb{Z}d=mathbb{Z}/dmathbb{Z}. Particularly, if d=p1a1p2a2ldots psas where p1, ldots, ps are distinct primes and 3leq p1a1leqcdotsleq psas, we present p1a1-1 MUMEB's in mathbb{C}dotimesmathbb{C}d by taking R=mathbb{F}_{p1a1}opluscdotsoplusmathbb{F}_{psas}, direct sum of finite fields (Theorem 3.3).

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study mutually unbiased maximally entangled bases (MUMEB's) in bipartite system mathbbC^dotimesmathbbC^d (d geq 3).

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #43669 #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68981 Affine Filtering Measurements a... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.