Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Characterization of two distant double-slits by chaotic light second-order interference
arXiv
Authors: Milena D'Angelo, Aldo Mazzilli, Francesco V. Pepe, Augusto Garuccio, Vincenzo Tamma
Year
2016
Paper ID
43615
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
106
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present the experimental characterization of two distant double-slit masks illuminated by chaotic light, in the absence of first-order imaging and interference. The scheme exploits second-order interference of light propagating through two indistinguishable pairs of {\it disjoint} optical paths passing through the masks of interest. The proposed technique leads to a deeper understanding of biphoton interference and coherence, and opens the way to the development of novel schemes for retrieving information on the relative position and the spatial structure of distant objects, which is of interest in remote sensing, biomedical imaging, as well as monitoring of laser ablation, when first-order imaging and interference are not feasible.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present the experimental characterization of two distant double-slit masks illuminated by chaotic light, in the absence of first-order imaging and interference.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.