Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Trade-off between speed and cost in shortcuts to adiabaticity

arXiv
Authors: Steve Campbell, Sebastian Deffner

Year

2016

Paper ID

43552

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

120

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Achieving effectively adiabatic dynamics is a ubiquitous goal in almost all areas of quantum physics. Here, we study the speed with which a quantum system can be driven when employing transitionless quantum driving. As a main result, we establish a rigorous link between this speed, the quantum speed limit, and the (energetic) cost of implementing such a shortcut to adiabaticity. Interestingly, this link elucidates a trade-off between speed and cost, namely that instantaneous manipulation is impossible as it requires an infinite cost. These findings are illustrated for two experimentally relevant systems - the parametric oscillator and the Landau-Zener model - which reveal that the spectral gap governs the quantum speed limit as well as the cost for realizing the shortcut.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Achieving effectively adiabatic dynamics is a ubiquitous goal in almost all areas of quantum physics.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #43552 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.