Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Effect of Pauli blocking on coherent states of composite bosons
arXiv
Authors: Shiue-Yuan Shiau, Monique Combescot
Year
2016
Paper ID
43342
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
200
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The quantum nature of elementary bosons can be completely erased by using coherent states known as Glauber states. Here, we consider composite bosons (cobosons) made of two fermions and look for the possibility to erase the bosonic quantum nature of the field and the fermionic quantum nature of its constituents, when the distribution of the coboson Schmidt decomposition is either flat like Frenkel excitons, or localized like Wannier excitons. We show that for Frenkel-like cobosons, complete erasure of the field quantum nature is possible up to a density which corresponds to a sizable fraction of the number of fermion-pair states making the coboson at hand. At higher density, the Pauli exclusion principle between fermionic constituents shows up dramatically. It induces: (i) the decrease of number-operator eigenvalues down to 1 and the increase of the number-state second-order correlation function up to 2; (ii) the disappearance of the usual sharp peak in the coherent-state distribution and the increase of the coherent-state second-order correlation function up to 2. It also is possible to construct number states and coherent states for Wannier-like cobosons, but their forms are far more complex. Finally, we show that Pauli blocking makes the coboson coherent states qualitatively different from the Anderson's ansatz.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The quantum nature of elementary bosons can be completely erased by using coherent states known as Glauber states.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.