Quick Navigation

Topics

Qubit Coherence Noise Stability Characterization

Casimir interactions between two parallel graphene sheets carrying steady-state drift currents

arXiv
Authors: Modi Ke, Dai-Nam Le, Lilia M. Woods

Year

2026

Paper ID

4307

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We investigate the fluctuation-induced Casimir interactions between two parallel graphene sheets carrying steady-state drift currents. The graphene properties are modeled based on the shifted Fermi disk model to capture the non-equilibrium optical response of the system. We find that the drift current introduces a repulsive correction to the perpendicular to the layers Casimir interaction, thereby reducing the overall attractive force. Although the correction is repulsive, it does not overcome the underlying attraction between the layers. It also generates a lateral force that opposes the carrier flow direction. Both contributions are studied in terms of distance and drift velocity functionalities showing pathways for Casimir force control.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Qubit Coherence, Noise & Stability Characterization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We investigate the fluctuation-induced Casimir interactions between two parallel graphene sheets carrying steady-state drift currents.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #4307

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.