Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Machine Learning

Calculation of entanglement in graph states up to five-qubit based on generalized concurrence

arXiv
Authors: Ahmad Akhound, Saeed Haddadi, Mohammad Ali Chaman Motlagh

Year

2016

Paper ID

43060

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

78

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We propose a new classification for the entanglement in graph states based on generalized con- currence. The numerical results indicate that the eight different three-qubit graph states in three categories, 64 four-qubit graph states in five categories and 1024 five-qubit graph states are in ten classes. We also compare this classification with equivalence classes of these graph states under local complementation (LC) operator, and the obtained result suggests that classification by generalized concurrence is not in contradiction with the LC-rule.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We propose a new classification for the entanglement in graph states based on generalized con- currence.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #43060 #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68978 Repair Before Veto, When Repair... #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69032 Beyond the Canonical Protocol: ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.