Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Experimental exclusion of a generalized Károlyházy gravity-induced decoherence model
arXiv
Authors: Nicola Bortolotti, Kristian Piscicchia, Matthias Laubenstein, Simone Manti, Antonino Marcianò, Federico Nola, Catalina Curceanu
Year
2026
Paper ID
4302
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We report new experimental constraints on the generalized version of the gravity-induced decoherence model originally proposed by Károlyházy. Using data collected by the VIP Collaboration at the INFN Gran Sasso National Laboratory with a high-purity germanium detector, we derive an improved lower bound on the spatial correlation length RK characterizing metric fluctuations in the model. We obtain a bound RK > 4.64 m (95% C.L.), which exceeds by more than an order of magnitude the previous experimental limit. When combined with the theoretical upper bound RK <1.98 m derived from macroscopic localization requirements, our result excludes the generalized Károlyházy model. The same conclusion applies to an associated non-Markovian formulation of the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model. Our findings significantly tighten experimental constraints on gravity-related decoherence scenarios and demonstrate the sensitivity of underground low-background experiments to foundational modifications of quantum mechanics.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We report new experimental constraints on the generalized version of the gravity-induced decoherence model originally proposed by Károlyházy.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.