Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger test for multi-dimension and arbitrary time nodes entangled histories
arXiv
Authors: Junkai Dong, YiMing Chen, Da Xu, Zhang-qi Yin
Year
2016
Paper ID
42956
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
133
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Based on the framework of consistent history theory, the quantum entangled history was proposed in 2015 and experimentally verified through temporal Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) test with 3 time nodes in 2016. In this paper, we extend the temporal GHZ test to arbitrary time nodes and even system dimensions. Then, we define a witness to distinguish between the quantum entangled histories and the classical histories. The minimums of the witness for the classical histories are calculated for arbitrary number of time nodes and the system dimensions 2 and infty. It is found that the minimums of the witness for the classical histories is always larger than the quantum entangled histories minimum -1. Only when both the number of time nodes and system dimensions approach to infinity, the minimum of the witness for classical and quantum entangled histories are identical.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Based on the framework of consistent history theory, the quantum entangled history was proposed in 2015 and experimentally verified through temporal Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.