Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Experimental characterization of a non-local convertor for quantum photonic networks
arXiv
Authors: Michal Mičuda, Robert Stárek, Petr Marek, Martina Miková, Ivo Straka, Miroslav Ježek, Toshiyuki Tashima, Şahin K. Özdemir, Mark Tame
Year
2016
Paper ID
42945
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We experimentally characterize a quantum photonic gate that is capable of converting multiqubit entangled states while acting only on two qubits. It is an important tool in large quantum networks, where it can be used for re-wiring of multipartite entangled states or for generating various entangled states required for specific tasks. The gate can be also used to generate quantum information processing resources, such as entanglement and discord. In our experimental demonstration, we converted a linear four-qubit cluster state into different entangled states, including GHZ and Dicke states. The high quality of the experimental results show that the gate has the potential of being a flexible component in distributed quantum photonic networks.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We experimentally characterize a quantum photonic gate that is capable of converting multiqubit entangled states while acting only on two qubits.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.