Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Software Tools Programming
Training-Free Certified Bounds for Quantum Regression: A Scalable Framework
arXiv
Authors: Demerson N. Gonçalves, Tharso D. Fernandes, Pedro H. G. Lugao, João T. Dias
Year
2026
Paper ID
4294
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
140
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a training-free, certified error bound for quantum regression derived directly from Pauli expectation values. Generalizing the heuristic of minimum accuracy from classification to regression, we evaluate axis-aligned predictors within the Pauli feature space. We formally prove that the optimal axis-aligned predictor constitutes a rigorous upper bound on the minimum training Mean Squared Error (MSE) attainable by any linear or kernel-based regressor defined on the same quantum feature map. Since computing this exact bound requires an intractable scan of the full Pauli basis, we introduce a Monte Carlo framework to efficiently estimate it using a tractable subset of measurement axes. We further provide non-asymptotic statistical guarantees to certify performance within a practical measurement budget. This method enables rapid comparison of quantum feature maps and early diagnosis of expressivity, allowing for the informed selection of architectures before deploying higher-complexity models.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Software Tools & Programming research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a training-free, certified error bound for quantum regression derived directly from Pauli expectation values.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.