Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication Related

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Fermionic ghost imaging

arXiv

Authors: Jianbin Liu, Yu Zhou, Huaibin Zheng, Hui Chen, Fu-li Li, Zhuo Xu

Year

2016

Paper ID

42909

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Ghost imaging with thermal fermions is calculated based on two-particle interference in Feynman's path integral theory. It is found that ghost imaging with thermal fermions can be simulated by ghost imaging with thermal bosons and classical particles. Photons in pseudothermal light are employed to experimentally study fermionic ghost imaging. Ghost imaging with thermal bosons and fermions is discussed based on the point-to-point (spot) correlation between the object and image planes. The employed method offers an efficient guidance for future ghost imaging with real thermal fermions, which may also be generalized to study other second-order interference phenomena with fermions.

Why This Paper Matters

This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
Ghost imaging with thermal fermions is calculated based on two-particle interference in Feynman's path integral theory.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/arXiv:1610.05002 [2] arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05002 [3] Publisher https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.05002

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0

Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.