Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Readout Calibration Error Analysis
Coherent control techniques for two-state quantum systems: A comparative study
arXiv
Authors: Boyan T. Torosov, Bruce W. Shore, Nikolay V. Vitanov
Year
2020
Paper ID
429
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
98
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We evaluate various sources of errors that occur when attempting to produce a specified coherent change of a two-state quantum system using six popular coherent control techniques: resonant excitation, adiabatic following, composite adiabatic passage, universal composite pulses, shortcut to adiabaticity, and single-shot shaped pulses. As error sources we consider spatial intensity distribution, transit time variation, inhomogeneous broadening, Doppler broadening, unwanted chirp and shape errors. For the various error types different techniques emerge as the best performers but overall, we find that universal composite pulses perform most consistently and are most resilient to errors compared to all other procedures.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Readout Calibration & Error Analysis research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We evaluate various sources of errors that occur when attempting to produce a specified coherent change of a two-state quantum system using six popular coherent control...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.