Quick Navigation
Topics
Qubit Coherence Noise Stability Characterization
Is the Conventional Picture of Coherence Time Complete? Dark Matter Recoherence
arXiv
Authors: Chaitanya Paranjape, Gilad Perez, Wolfram Ratzinger, Somasundaram Sankaranarayanan
Year
2026
Paper ID
4289
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
90
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The local solar gravitational potential forms a basin for ultralight dark matter (ULDM), with discrete energy levels. Even if barely populated, it introduces a new characteristic timescale in DM dynamics. This necessitates a generalization of the notion of coherence time. We find that, at long times, the phenomenon of recoherence emerges, whereby a subcomponent of ULDM exhibits a formally divergent coherence time. The fact that this generalized coherence time can significantly exceed the naive estimate implies an enhanced sensitivity for dark matter searches that accumulate data over extended observation periods.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Qubit Coherence, Noise & Stability Characterization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The local solar gravitational potential forms a basin for ultralight dark matter (ULDM), with discrete energy levels.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.