Quick Navigation

Topics

Topological Quantum Computing

Robust unidirectional transport in a one-dimensional metacrystal with long-range hopping

arXiv
Authors: Stefano Longhi

Year

2016

Paper ID

42856

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

107

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In two- and three-dimensional structures, topologically-protected chiral edge modes offer a powerful mean to realize robust light transport. However, little attention has been paid so far to robust one-way transport in one-dimensional systems. Here it is shown that unidirectional transport, which is immune to disorder and backscattering, can occur in certain one-dimensional metacrystals with long-range hopping without resorting to topological protection. Such metacrystals are described by an effective Hermitian Hamiltonian with broken time reversal symmetry, and transport does not require adiabatic (Thouless) pumping. A simple implementation in optics of such one-dimensional metacrystals, based on transverse light dynamics in a self-imaging optical cavity with phase gratings, is suggested

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Topological Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In two- and three-dimensional structures, topologically-protected chiral edge modes offer a powerful mean to realize robust light transport.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #42856

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.