Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Superconducting Qubits

Robust quantum state transfer between two superconducting qubits via partial measurement

arXiv
Authors: Yan-Ling Li, Yao Yao, Xing Xiao

Year

2016

Paper ID

42841

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

92

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We develop a potentially practical proposal for robust quantum state transfer (QST) between two superconducting qubits coupled by a coplanar waveguide (CPW) resonator. We show that the partial measurement could drastically enhance the fidelity even when the dissipation of qubits and CPW is considered. Unlike many other schemes for QST, our proposal does not require the couplings between the qubits and the CPW resonator to be strong. In fact, our method works much more efficiently in the weak coupling regime. The underlying mechanism is attributed to the probabilistic nature of partial measurement.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We develop a potentially practical proposal for robust quantum state transfer (QST) between two superconducting qubits coupled by a coplanar waveguide (CPW) resonator.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #42841 #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69534 Readout-Induced Leakage in Supe... #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69590 Quantum Simulation of Spin-Depe...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.