Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Entropy Information Measures

Entropy and Variance Squeezing of V-type Atom in Dissipative Cavity

arXiv
Authors: Zijin Liang, Qiying Pan, Hong-Mei Zou, Chenrui Bi

Year

2026

Paper ID

4258

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

108

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Based on Ref.\cite{Riccardi A}, we investigate the entropy and variance squeezing of a V-type atom in a dissipative cavity, and discuss the influences of parameters including the spontaneously generated interference (SGI) (θ), the cavity-environment coupling $γ0/κ$ and the atom-cavity detuning (Δ) on the atomic squeezing by using different initial states. The results show that no squeezing of Sy occurs under any condition and that variance squeezing of Sx appears only when Δ>0. Entropy squeezing quantifies quantum fluctuations more precisely than variance squeezing. Moreover, the atomic squeezing of Sx clearly depends on θ, γ0/κ, Δ and the initial state. These findings are meaningful for quantum information processing as an ultra-low-noise resource.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Entropy & Information Measures research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Based on Ref.citeRiccardi A, we investigate the entropy and variance squeezing of a V-type atom in a dissipative cavity, and discuss the influences of parameters including the...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #4258

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.