Quick Navigation
Topics
Neutral Atom Rydberg Quantum Computing
Quantum Circuit Design Gate Engineering
Overcoming Stark-Shift Constraints in Phase-Controlled Rydberg Two-Qubit Gates
arXiv
Authors: Ignacio R. Sola, Sebastian C. Carrasco, Vladimir S. Malinovsky, Seokmin Shin, Bo Y. Chang
Year
2026
Paper ID
4257
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
89
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Stark shifts introduce additional phases that constrain the set of entangling gates that can be prepared via two-photon transitions in the strong Rydberg blockade limit. For non-independently addressed qubits, by controlling the absolute phases and the local amplitudes of the pulses at each qubit, we show that any two-qubit phase gate can be prepared with high fidelity using a three-pulse sequence. Based on these insights, we introduce two robust control schemes tailored to different phase gates that yield better results with pulse sequences of either even or odd length.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Neutral-Atom & Rydberg Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Stark shifts introduce additional phases that constrain the set of entangling gates that can be prepared via two-photon transitions in the strong Rydberg blockade limit.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.