Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Improved key rate bounds for practical decoy-state quantum key distribution systems
arXiv
Authors: Zhen Zhang, Qi Zhao, Mohsen Razavi, Xiongfeng Ma
Year
2016
Paper ID
42504
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
163
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The decoy-state scheme is the most widely implemented quantum key distribution protocol in practice. In order to account for the finite-size key effects on the achievable secret key generation rate, a rigorous statistical fluctuation analysis is required. Originally, a heuristic Gaussian-approximation technique was used for this purpose, which, despite of its analytical convenience, was not sufficiently rigorous. The fluctuation analysis has recently been made rigorous by using the Chernoff bound. There is a considerable gap, however, between the key rate bounds obtained from these new techniques and that obtained from the Gaussian assumption. Here, we develop a tighter bound for the decoy-state method, which yields a smaller failure probability. This improvement results in a higher key rate and increases the maximum distance over which secure key exchange is possible. By optimizing the system parameters, our simulation results show that our new method almost closes the gap between the two previously proposed techniques and achieves a similar performance to that of conventional Gaussian approximations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The decoy-state scheme is the most widely implemented quantum key distribution protocol in practice.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.