Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Enhancing quantum state transfer efficiency in binary-tree spin networks by partially collapsing measurements

arXiv
Authors: Naghi Behzadi, Bahram Ahansaz

Year

2016

Paper ID

42479

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

118

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this work, quantum state transfer (QST) over binary-tree spin networks is studied by using advantages of partially collapsing measurements. To this aim, we perform initially a weak measurement (WM) on central qubit of the binary-tree network, which encoding the state of concern and after time evolution of the whole system, a quantum measurement reversal (QMR) on the destined qubit is performed. By taking the optimal value of the QMR, it is shown that the QST can be improved considerably by controlling the WM strength and by choosing it close enough to 1, near-perfect QST can be achieved. We also show that how entanglement distribution quality over the binary-tree spin network can be obviously improved by using this approach.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this work, quantum state transfer (QST) over binary-tree spin networks is studied by using advantages of partially collapsing measurements.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #42479 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.