!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Thermodynamics

Performance of superadiabatic quantum machines

arXiv
Authors: Obinna Abah, Eric Lutz

Year

2016

Paper ID

42182

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

82

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We investigate the performance of a quantum thermal machine operating in finite time based on shortcut-to-adiabaticity techniques. We compute efficiency and power for a quantum harmonic Otto engine by taking the energetic cost of the superadiabatic driving explicitly into account. We further derive generic upper bounds on both quantities, valid for any heat engine cycle, using the notion of quantum speed limits for driven systems. We demonstrate that these quantum bounds are tighter than those stemming from the second law of thermodynamics.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Thermodynamics research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We investigate the performance of a quantum thermal machine operating in finite time based on shortcut-to-adiabaticity techniques.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #42182 #77841 Nonadditivity in quantum field ... #77825 Thermodynamic gravity with non-... #77786 General quantum resources provi... #77779 Thermodynamics of an open two-l...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.