Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
1-out-of-2 Oblivious transfer using flawed Bit-string quantum protocol
arXiv
Authors: Martin Plesch, Marcin Pawlowski, Matej Pivoluska
Year
2016
Paper ID
42118
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
157
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Oblivious transfer (OT) is an important tool in cryptography. It serves as a subroutine to other complex procedures of both theoretical and practical significance. Common attribute of OT protocols is that one party (Alice) has to send a message to another party (Bob) and has to stay oblivious on whether Bob did receive the message. Specific (OT) protocols vary by exact definition of the task - in the all-or-nothing protocol Alice sends a single bit-string message, which Bob is able to read only with 50% probability, whereas in 1-out-of-2 OT protocol Bob reads one out of two messages sent by Alice. These two flavours of protocol are known to be equivalent. Recently a computationally secure all-or-nothing OT protocol based on quantum states was developed in [A. Souto et. al., PRA 91, 042306], which however cannot be reduced to 1-out-of-2 OT protocol by standard means. Here we present an elaborated reduction of this protocol which retains the security of the original.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Oblivious transfer (OT) is an important tool in cryptography.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.