You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Random Field Quantization Method
arXiv
Authors: Gabor Helesfai
Year
2016
Paper ID
42112
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
142
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Today it still remains a challenge whether quantum mechanics has an underlying statistical explanation or not. While there are and were a lot of models trying to explain quantum phenomena with statistical methods these all failed on certain levels. In this paper a method is proposed that is not only based on a classical statistical framework but it has an underlying physical model behind it and it can explain some of the basic characteristics of quantum mechanics. It will be shown that if look at the properties of a charged particle in a random electric field one can obtain the discrete energy values of the harmonic oscillator and the infinite potential well, and also gives a good qualitative description of the double-slit experiment and measurement theory. Also the side-effect of the model is the emergence of a constant with an action dimension.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Today it still remains a challenge whether quantum mechanics has an underlying statistical explanation or not.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.