Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Efficient quantum tomography II
arXiv
Authors: Ryan O'Donnell, John Wright
Year
2016
Paper ID
42100
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
273
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Following [OW16], we continue our analysis of: (1) "Quantum tomography", i.e., learning a quantum state, i.e., the quantum generalization of learning a discrete probability distribution; (2) The distribution of Young diagrams output by the RSK algorithm on random words. Regarding (2), we introduce two powerful new tools: (i) A precise upper bound on the expected length of the longest union of k disjoint increasing subsequences in a random length-n word with letter distribution α1 geq α2 geq cdots geq αd; (ii) A new majorization property of the RSK algorithm that allows one to analyze the Young diagram formed by the lower rows λk, λk+1, dots of its output. These tools allow us to prove several new theorems concerning the distribution of random Young diagrams in the nonasymptotic regime, giving concrete error bounds that are optimal, or nearly so, in all parameters. As one example, we give a fundamentally new proof of the fact that the expected length of the longest increasing sequence in a random length-n permutation is bounded by 2sqrt{n}. This is the k = 1, αi equiv frac1d, d → infty special case of a much more general result we prove: the expected length of the kth Young diagram row produced by an α-random word is αk n pm 2sqrt{αkd n}. From our new analyses of random Young diagrams we derive several new results in quantum tomography, including: (i) Learning the eigenvalues of an unknown state to ε-accuracy in Hellinger-squared, chi-squared, or KL distance, using n = O\(d2/ε\) copies; (ii) Learning the optimal rank-k approximation of an unknown state to ε-fidelity (Hellinger-squared distance) using n = widetilde{O}(kd/ε) copies.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Following [OW16], we continue our analysis of: (1) "Quantum tomography", i.e., learning a quantum state, i.e., the quantum generalization of learning a discrete probability...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.